Assembly eliminates
business, boat taxes
By Jessica Edwards
The Haines Borough Assembly Tuesday voted 5-1 to adopt a
$14.6 million budget, and voted 5-1 to eliminate taxes on business property and boats that
had been on the books for decades.
Eliminating the business property and boats taxes leaves
the borough with a $194,000 budget shortfall, which the assembly voted to draw from its
$4.7 million general fund balance.
Assemblyman Norm Smith opposed eliminating taxes on boats
and business property, and assemblyman Doug Olerud opposed adoption of the budget.
The $14.6 million budget sets property taxes at last years
levels and draws about $615,000 out of fund reserves to address revenue shortfalls and
deferred maintenance.
A $2 million increase in the budget over last year
reflects major capital projects as well as increased borough wages.
Borough manager Tom Bolens proposed budget had
raised property tax rates slightly to balance the budget.
The total impact of Bolens proposed mill rate
increase to the boroughs general fund revenue would have been about $58,000, but
assembly members resisted raising taxes, drawing instead on the $4 million fund balance.
The fund balance is budgeted but unspent money rolled
over year after year, a combination of left over tax dollars from items such as unfilled
borough positions and money from outside the community.
While tax rates in the townsite and borough were kept at
last years levels, taxes in road maintenance service areas did increase as a result
of residents request to tax themselves at a higher rate to pay for snow removal
services.
Eagle Vista RMSA mill rates increased to 12.59, up from
11.71 in 2009; Riverview RMSA will be taxed at a 13.32 mill rate, up from 10 mills in
2009; and Chilkat Lake RMSAs mill rate is 8.18, up from 7.6. Tax rates for Fire
District Three increased to 8.38, up from 8.15 last year, at the districts request.
Grants to community organizations were funded at last
years levels, without requested increases.
A decision Tuesday to eliminate business property and
boat taxes left an additional $200,000 gap in revenue, which the assembly also decided to
draw out of fund balances.
Assemblyman Scott Rossman pushed to spend $300,000 in
fund balances on deferred maintenance of borough facilities. The assembly agreed to spend
$150,000 for demolition of old school buildings, $20,000 for ventilation systems at the
Chilkat Center, $80,000 to repair the roof at the borough administration building, $25,000
for boiler upgrades and a $25,000 contingency.
Were spending too much money, said
Olerud, who voted against adopting the budget. Just overall.
Olerud said although spending on capital projects, such
as $5 million on boat harbor upgrades, inflated total budget expenditures this year, the
borough budget was too dependent on outside sources of revenue.
For example, nearly $500,000 in the budget comes from
federal secure schools money, and a similar amount comes from state revenue sharing
dollars, a source that fluctuates annually.
Olerud said the assembly should be anticipating loss of
those revenue streams by paring down the budget.
Olerud said he was also concerned about dipping so deeply
into the boroughs budget reserves, though he said addressing deferred maintenance
was a positive step.
The assemblys decision Tuesday to eliminate the
business and personal property tax and a flat tax on boats is effective immediately.
Members said honor system reporting made the tax unfair, and said it unfairly penalized
business owners for upgrading equipment.
Combined borough revenue from the taxes was projected at
about $194,000, with about $180,000 coming from business and personal property and $24,000
levied on boats.
The business tax is applied to business equipment,
excluding buildings, assets fixed to the ground, and inventory.
Records show local taxes on business property date at
least to 1948, when the Haines Independent School District levied taxes on real and
personal property to pay for the school. A historic flat tax of $5-$15 personal and
commercial boats, size dependent, was raised in 1989 to $55-$165 amid heated resistance,
particularly from commercial fishermen, and months of debate.
Smith said he wouldnt vote to abolish the business
property and boat taxes until he knew where the lost revenue to this years budget
could be recouped.
Assemblyman Steve Vick, who Tuesday voted in favor of
dumping the taxes, said at a budget committee workshop June 4 he was concerned about the
lost revenue stream and said perhaps the tax could be eliminated next year to give the
assembly time to budget accordingly.
Chief fiscal officer Jila Stuart said drawing on fund
balance reserves was not a long-term solution for recouping the revenue lost by
eliminating the tax. Options for recouping the money were raising property tax mill rates
or levying a new sort tax, she said.
Assemblyman Scott Rossman spoke in favor of cutting the
budget next year instead. We should cut instead of spending. Were only talking
about $194,000. Thats 1.4 percent of the total budget.
Assemblyman Jerry Lapp said the borough lands department
would be updating property appraisals in the townsite this year, adding income to the
boroughs tax rolls.
Stuart said taxable values in the borough had increased 6
percent this year as a result of updated assessments, and said the assessor estimated
reappraising townsite properties would increase property tax roles an additional 6
percent.
Borough manager Tom Bolen said some property, including
fixed infrastructure like telephone poles owned by the local utility, were currently taxed
as business property but may actually be real property.
Reevaluating and recategorizing some property
designations could soften the impact. Business property taxes paid by Alaska Power and
Telephone account for nearly 25 percent, or $73,000, of that income stream, Bolen said.
Vick said Tuesday he was convinced increased property
taxes and possibly recategorizing some business property wouldnt leave too big a
hole in the budget.
Resident Nancy Nash was an assemblywoman when the boat
tax was increased in 1989. In an interview this week, Nash said passing the tax had been
controversial, but she had felt it fair and thought it remained so.
I would go home crying from meetings. It was one of
the hardest things I did on the assembly.
Nash said she opposed repealing the tax, in part because
she thought it fair, but also because it wasnt the individuals affected that brought
its repeal. It wouldnt be easy to reinstate another such tax, she said. (Repealing
it) should be done advisedly.