Connelly Lake hydro
concerns biologists

By Jessica Edwards

Citing a radio-tagging study of spawning sockeye conducted last summer, Fish and Game biologists are expressing concern about a proposed hydroelectric project at Connelly Lake in the upper Chilkoot River Valley.

The study found about 21 percent of the run spawns in the upper river above the lake, biologist Randy Bachman told the Alaska Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Advisory Council last week.

“The upper river is very, very important to Chilkoot Lake sockeye,” Bachman said in an interview. While the proposed project might prove sound, Bachman said, “We’ve got to be careful.”

Of 232 spawning sockeyes tagged over two years, 48 spawned in inlet streams feeding Chilkoot Lake and 171 spawned in the lake itself. Transmitter locations showed lake spawners were most highly concentrated on the west and northwest lakeshore.

Bachman said the hydro project, proposed by local utility Alaska Power and Telephone at Connelly Lake about three miles north of the lake, was unique in its proximity to sockeye rearing. “I’m not aware of any hydro project in Southeast placed in a large, sockeye-producing system.”

That means there aren’t comparative studies Fish and Game could draw on to determine potential impacts of a large hydro project on sockeye stocks, he said.

AP&T regional manager Stan Selmer said in January king salmon runs in Pullen Creek in Skagway, downstream from Dewey Lake hydro, had gained strength in recent years.

But sockeye are particularly sensitive to environmental change, Bachman said, because of their long rearing time in fresh water and their reliance on the lake environment.

Among concerns Bachman cited are increased glacial flow coming from Connelly Lake in winter months through the proposed project’s dam and penstock, which might impact rearing fish, and increased turbidity in inlet streams and Chilkoot Lake from development and construction. Turbidity is a clouded water condition that can be caused by sedimentation.

Bachman said recent studies of Chilkoot Lake sockeye showed a direct relationship between turbidity levels and sockeye production.

The Fish and Game study specifically correlated warmer air temperatures, increased glacial melt, and increased turbidity with decreased food sources and lower sockeye returns per spawning fish.

Bachman said the Chilkoot was famous for wildly fluctuating runs based on variable summer temperatures, but said adding sources of turbidity to the pristine watershed would negatively affect the run.

“The concern I have is increased turbidity in the lake through construction,” said Bachman. “Sockeye are one of the most sensitive species and most subject to environmental change.”

Chilkoot Lake sockeye stocks comprise 30 to 40 percent of Lynn Canal sockeye, which Bachman said contributed about $1 million to the area’s commercial fishery.

Commercial processor Clyde Bell said the Chilkoot sockeye fishery wasn’t worth risking. “That run out there is definitely diminished” compared to previous years,” Bell said, naming beavers as a possible culprit. “Preferably we’d find some other location… We need to be trying to enhance and protect that run, not endanger it.”

Bell said the borough needed additional, clean sources of power but faulted AP&T for applying for only one permit to develop hydro project when other locations in Haines and Skagway could be viable.

Besides posing potential dangers to the sockeye run, Bell said, the community was liable to put up a fight over a hydro project in Chilkoot River corridor. “It’s going to be a community battle.

“We need a rational approach that will provide clean hydropower while protecting our salmon.”

Chilkoot Indian Association administrator Greg Stuckey said while the tribe supports AP&T’s grant application for permitting Connelly Lake, judgment on the project’s merit would await studies proving it was safer for fish.

  “If they propose a project that will harm fish, it will be a no-go,” he said. Tribal members rely on the fishery for subsistence food and income, he said.

The CIA also has concerns about potential impacts to archaeological sites at Chilkoot, Stuckey said.

AP&T expects a decision on a $988,000 grant request to the state energy authority by March. The money would fund initial design of the 12-megawatt project, estimated to cost $34 million.